Pragmatic Issues in Discourse Analysis

Louis de Saussure (University of Neuchâtel)

Volume 1 Issue 1

Abstract

Starting from the problems raised by the notion of 'discourse' and its definition, this paper takes issue with the views that consider discourse as an object of study observable and describable as a 'whole' static structure, and which meaning is richer than the sum of the meanings stemming from the individual utterances composing it. The assumptions previously put forward by authors such as Chafe, who claimed that discourse is better studied as a process unfolding through time, is taken seriously into account. Within the ongoing discussion about the very notion of discourse, some arguments are proposed to sustain the view that all the meaning produced by a given discourse is in fact reducible to the meaning produced by the single utterances composing it; in particular, implicit rhetorical relations are conceived as the result of pragmatic inferences of the same nature as contextual hypotheses in general, and therefore rhetorical relations are to be interpreted at the level of pragmatic meaning.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF

References

Allott, N. (2005) The role of misused concepts in manufacturing consent: A cognitive account. In L. de Saussure and P. Schulz (eds), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.147-168.

Bach, K. (1994) Conversational impliciture. Mind and Language 9: 124-162.

Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays. Ed. Michael Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Baron-Cohen, S. (1995) Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Blakemore, D. (2002) Relevance and Linguistic Meaning. The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Blass, R. (2005) Manipulation in the speech and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a Relevance-Theoretic viewpoint.  In L. de Saussure and P. Schulz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.169-190.

Carston, R. (2002) Relevance Theory and the saying / implicating distinction. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1-35.

Chafe, W. (1987) Cognitive constraints on information flow. In R. Tomlin (ed.), Coherence and grounding in discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.21-51.

Chilton, P. (2005) Missing links in mainstream CDA: Modules, blends and the critical instinct. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (eds), A New Research Agenda in Critical Discourse Analysis: Theory and Interdisciplinarity. Amterdam: John Benjamins. pp.19-51.

Choi I., Nisbett R. and Smith E. (1997) Culture, category salience, and inductive reasoning. Cognition 65-1: 15-32.

Fairclough, N. (1999) Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Longman.

Faust, M. and Gernsbacher, M.A. (1996) Cerebral mechanisms for suppression of inappropriate information during sentence comprehension. Brain and Language 53: 234-259.

Frazier, L. and Clifton, C. (1996) Construal. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Gibbs, R. (1989) Understanding and literal meaning. Cognitive Science 13: 243-251.

Gibbs, R. (2002) A new look at literal meaning in understanding what is said and implicated. Journal of Pragmatics 34: 457-486.

Gibbs, R. (2003) Embodied experience and linguistic meaning. Brain and Language 84: 1-15.

Girotto, V., Kemmelmeier, M., Sperber, D. and van der Henst, J.-B. (2001) Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task. Cognition 81: B69-B76.

Grice, P. (1975) Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts. Syntax and Semantics 3. New York: Academic Press. pp.41-58.

Iten, C. (2005) Linguistic Meaning, Truth Conditions and Relevance: The Case of Concessives. Basingstoke: Palgrave-McMillan.

Jaszczolt, K.M. (2005) Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. (1993) From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kempson, R., Meyer-Viol, W. and Gabbay, D. (2000) Dynamic Syntax: The Flow of Language Understanding. Oxford: Blackwell.

Komatsu, R. and Harris, R. (eds) (1993) Saussure F. de. Troisième cours de linguistique générale (1910 – 1911). Oxford : Pergamon Press.

Labelle, M. (2001) 1971-2001: Trente ans de psycholinguistique. Revue québécoise de linguistique 30/1

Lakatos, I. (1970) Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.51-58.

Lascarides A. and Asher, N. (1993) Temporal interpretation, discourse relations and commonsense entailment. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437-493.

MacDonald, M., Pearlmutter, N. and Seidenberg, M. (1994) Syntactic ambiguity resolution as lexical ambiguity resolution. In C. Clifton, L. Frazier and K. Rayner (eds), Perspectives on Sentence Processing. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp.123-153.

Mann, W.C. and Thompson, S.A. (1988) Rhetorical Structure Theory : Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text 8: 243-281.

Mitchell, D. (1994. Sentence parsing. In M. Gernsbascher (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press. pp.375-409.

Noveck, I. and Sperber, D. (eds) (2004) Experimental Pragmatics. Basinstoke: Palgrave.

Perry, J. (2000) The Problem of the Essential Indexical and Other Essays. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.

Pollock, J.Y. (1997) Langage et Cognition. Introduction au Programme Minimaliste de la Grammaire Générative. Paris: PUF.

Recanati, F. (2002) Unarticulated constituents. Linguistics and Philosophy 25 :
299-345.

Recanati, F. (in progress) It is raining (somewhere).

Roulet, E., Filliettaz, L., Grobet, A. and Burger, M. (2001) Un Modèle et un Instrument d’Analyse du Discours. Berne: Lang.

Rubinelli, S., Nakamoto, K., Schulz, P. and Saussure, L. de (forthcoming) What are we to think about direct-to-consumer-advertising? A case study on the adverts for Zoloft and Allegra 180mg. Studies in Communication Science.

Saussure, L. de (2005a) Pragmatique procédurale et discours. Revue de Sémantique et Pragmatique 18 : 9-33.

Saussure, L. de (2005b) Manipulation and cognitive pragmatics. Preliminary hypotheses. In L. de Saussure and P. Schulz (eds), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.113-146.

Saussure, L. de (2005c) Parallélisme et linéarité de l'interprétation: Remarques sur un cas de causalité inverse. Intellectica 40: 43-62.

Saussure, L. de (2007) Procedural pragmatics and the study of discourse. Pragmatics and Cognition 15/1 (special issue, ‘Pragmatic Interfaces’): 139-160.

Saussure, L. de (to appear) Quelle réalité derrière l’hypothèse polyphonique? In C. Muller (ed.), Mélanges offerts à André Rousseau.

Smith, N. and Tsimpli, I-M. (1995) The Mind of a Savant: Language Learning and Modularity. Oxford: Blackwell.

Sperber, D. and Wilson, D. (1997) The mapping between the mental and the public lexicon. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 9: 107-126.

Taboda, M. and Mann, W.C. (in press) Rhetorical Structure Theory: Looking back and moving ahead. Discourse Studies.

Ter Meulen, A. (1995) Representing Time in Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

van Dijk, T. (1998) Ideology. London: Sage.

van Eemeren, F. and Grootendorst, R. (1992) Argumentation, Communication and Fallacies. A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum: Hillsdale.

Wodak, R. (2007) Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis. A cross-theoretical inquiry. Pragmatics and Cognition 15/1 (special issue ‘Pragmatic Interfaces’): 203-234.

Weinrich, H. (1957) Tempus: Beschprochene und Erzählte Welt. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.